How many people do you know who will write you a $1000 check tomorrow.

Well, in my case it wasn’t that many.

Our “Democracy” has been for sale for a LONG time. What are we going to do about it?

http://just6dollars.org/splash/

And yes, McCain has done work in that regard, but that alone is not enough for me. Especially considering his VP. The last thing I want in the White House is an EXTREME religious wacko.

For instance, Personal PAC, sent out a Dan Duffy hit piece claiming he supports criminalizing abortion, complete with photos of a woman behind rebar (guess they were too cheap to have a real photo shoot done in jail) saying Duffy would jail women. Tell me my liberal brother, where is the sense in that? It’s blatantly not true, it was mailed to every registered female voter in the district though.

Our processes have been polluted by the dirty money of special interests groups, at least McCain has a record of trying to fight that — Obama, right down to the house he lives in, is a PRODUCT of special interests.

Face it. Nobody, I mean nobody, “supports” partial birth abortion as a choice of convenience. You’d have to be a fool with a cold, dead heart to do so. But in cases where the mother’s life is at stake, it is sometimes the only option. In those cases, which “life” is worth more?

And you can’t tell me you really care about an abortion isssue. You know as well as I do that presidential elections are not about abortion, or guns, or any of the other hot button issues that politicians use to energize the base. Roe v Wade isn’t going anywhere, and neither is the second amendment.

McCain, however, is nothing but a spoiled brat who has had every advantage. I do not denounce his service, but I do denounce the man and his attempts to distract the electorate.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain

Apparently you didn’t even read my post, the 2003 version had specific language that mirrored the federal version, that specifically said it had no standing on a woman’s right to choose and he still voted against it even though he said he would support it during his presidential campaign.

Bring some facts and I’ll look at them, I haven’t seen any yet except statements from his campaign (now that’s a reliable source) and a partisan website.

Obama campaign spokesman Tommy Vietor has said that Obama would have voted for the 2005 Illinois bill if he had been a state legislator when it was considered because it addressed the concerns present in the 2003 version, much as he says he would have supported the federal bill, which wouldn’t have impacted non-existent federal law.

These are tired and desperate attacks.

http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/09/25/nrlc-born-ali ve-obama-infant-protections-attacks